thanks Kevin ;)

--j.

Kevin A. McGrail writes:
> I've requested that at least one of them does and will try and follow up on 
> it.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Kevin A. McGrail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "SpamAssassin Dev" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 5:35 AM
> Subject: Re: Fw: [Mimedefang] SA 3.2.0 and tmp files
> 
> 
> >
> > hopefully they'll open a bug about it...
> >
> > --j.
> >
> > Kevin A. McGrail writes:
> >> Just an FYI. I know nothing more about the issue:
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> From: "Frank Doepper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 8:27 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] SA 3.2.0 and tmp files
> >>
> >>
> >> > Am 04.05.2007 19:18 schrieb Kelson:
> >> >> Jason Bertoch [Electronet] wrote:
> >> >>> To the point...since upgrading to 3.2.0, I'm seeing non-text temp
> >> >>> files being
> >> >>> left behind by SA.  They aren't left for every message; most are
> >> >>> created and
> >> >>> destroyed as expected.  Unfortunately, the data contained within does
> >> >>> not
> >> >>> contain any information I can tie to a specific message type or case.
> >> >>> Other
> >> >>> than filling up my /tmp space, I see no mail flow problems.  Is 
> >> >>> anyone
> >> >>> else
> >> >>> seeing these temp files left behind?
> >> >>
> >> >> Hmm, no signs of that problem here, and we upgraded on Wednesday.
> >> >>
> >> >> Not sure if it matters, but our MD initscript sets TMPDIR to point to
> >> >> our spool directory, which is on tmpfs.  I've checked both the 
> >> >> spooldir
> >> >> and /tmp just to be sure.
> >> >>
> >> >> MD 2.62, SA 3.20, Sendmail 8.13.8 on Mandriva 2007.
> >> >
> >> > The problem is even worse at our site, we have mimedefang-multiplexor
> >> > running with "-l" and get
> >> >
> >> > Slave 5 stderr: seek() on closed filehandle $tmpfile at
> >> > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message/Node.pm line 
> >> > 305.
> >> >
> >> > when there is a little bit load on the box. Is it because SA is not
> >> > thread-safe? How to solve this?
> >> >
> >> > mimedefang-2.52, SA 3.2.0, sendmail-8.13.6 running.
> >> >
> >> > The behaviour started with upgrade from SA-3.1.7 to SA-3.2.0.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Frank.
> >

Reply via email to