http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5466
Summary: SA Rules for some of IADB data say "spam" for things
like publishing rDNS and using COI
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.2.0
Platform: Other
URL: http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_2_x.html
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Rules
AssignedTo: [email protected]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We just noticed (well, had brought to our attention, really), that you've
expanded SA's use of our IADB
data (yay!..it was built that way to make it easy for SA to use!..thank
you!)...BUT...also, several of the
things which one would think would give a sender a "positive" score (i.e. they
are doing the right thing)
or at least not a "spam" score, are in fact giving them a ding. The following
all have a positive ("this
could be spam") value of 1 (not -1...plus 1):
Sender publishes rDNS
Sender publishes Domain Keys
Confirmed opt-in used more than 50% of the time
Confirmed opt-in used less than 50% of the time (by contrast, Habeas' regular
non-confirmed (single)
opt in gets a -4.3)
All mail is at least opt-in
All email is one-to-one or transactional *only* (no bulk mail at all)
Sends no material that falls within the Michigan or Utah Child Protection
Registery (i.e. they *don't*
send adult materials)
By contrast, our "Scrapes addresses, pure opt-out only", "Accepts unverified
sign-ups" and "Accepts
unverified sign-ups, gives chance to opt out" actually all have a *negative*
score in SA! Huh??
Something is clearly a little topsy-turvy here; what can we do to get this
sorted out?
Thanks!
Anne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
