http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5488
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-31 04:06 ------- as I noted by mail: 'Well, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D is the main issue I'd say, since it has the higher FPs and a much more significant score: score FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D 2.599 1.992 1.692 1.212 # n=2 score FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB 0.102 0.095 0.055 0.223 # n=2 STATISTICS-set3.txt: 7.010 10.9120 0.1316 0.988 0.64 0.22 FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB STATISTICS-set3.txt: 20.447 31.7873 0.4565 0.986 0.58 1.21 FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D Since they overlap heavily with RDNS_DYNAMIC, perhaps we should consider reducing/zeroing one or both scores for 3.2.1.' I'd be in favour of zeroing both rules if the overlap figures are high. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
