http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5497
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-06 14:31 ------- > I suspect that at least of the reason is the change in the auto-learn ham > threshold which means that 3.2 auto-learns a lot fewer messages as ham than > previous versions did. Which means that if you are just auto-learning, and not > calling sa-learn to learn ham, a disproportionate number of spam tokens will > be > learnt. I can definitely say that a vast majority (+95%) of our learning is from the > auto-learning system. It has been difficult to get our users to feed significant amounts of both ham and spam to our sa-learn feedback mechanism. Any change in > the auto-learn thresholds are likely effecting the accuracy of our database. Is this something simple I can change to revert back to the pre-3.2.0 setting? What was the previous value for bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam? > USER OPTIONS > The following configuration settings are used to control auto-learn- > ing: > > bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam n.nn (default: 0.1) > The score threshold below which a mail has to score, to be fed > into SpamAssassinâs learning systems automatically as a non-spam > message. > > bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam n.nn (default: 12.0) > The score threshold above which a mail has to score, to be fed > into SpamAssassinâs learning systems automatically as a spam mes- > sage. > > Note: SpamAssassin requires at least 3 points from the header, and > 3 points from the body to auto-learn as spam. Therefore, the min- > imum working value for this option is 6. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
