Justin Mason wrote: > Theo Van Dinter writes: > >> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:54:18PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote: >> >>> as far as I know, if they're rules in the "rulesrc" tree, it's >>> C-T-R; but rules in the "rules" dir are still R-T-C. >>> >>> I'd be happy to loosen this up, though. >>> >> I'm fine with that too. The rules dir (imo) is essentially a snapshot of the >> rules in the update channel at the time, so I don't see much reason to have >> them not both be CTR. >> > > ok, let's vote to change the procedure: that changes in the "rules" tree > be considered Commit-Then-Review, even when changes in the code (such as > "lib") are considered Review-Then-Commit. > > My vote: +1 > > --j. >
My vote is +1. If any committer isn't confident in a rule they can always hold off committing and ask others to test it..
