Duncan Findlay writes: > On Jul 27, 2007, at 7:08 AM, Justin Mason wrote: > > > Just wondering. would it be handy to have a new "body" type, the > > same as > > "body" but matched as a single string, with all newlines converted > > to " "? > > in other words, this text: > > [...] > > > ie, no newlines, all whitespace converted to " ". this would be > > optimal > > for matching with phrase rules. (To avoid exponential-runtime .* > > problems, it'd chop the text after the first 8000 characters or so.) > > How is this different than rawbody /s rules?
rawbody doesn't interpret HTML or convert whitespace. --j.
