Mark Martinec writes:
> > - dbg("rules: $rule (pri $basepri) requires $dep (pri $deppri): fixed");
> > + dbg("rules: %s (pri %s) requires %s (pri %s): fixed",
> > + $rule,$basepri, $dep,$deppri);
>
> > I'm afraid I'm -0.5 on this stuff.
> >
> > I find %s format strings much harder to read (and use) than simple string
> > interpolation. In some cases, of course, they make sense; but for most,
> > they don't.
> >
> > Could you revert those changes that add %s usage? (I'm happy enough about
> > the eval changes, though.)
>
> Ok, will revert the straightforward cases involving mostly scalars.
> Yell if you feel I missed any.
cool. Thanks!
--j.
