http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5624
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-24 08:48 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Lookin at JM's SOUGHT rules, there may be rules which include URIs & become > > redundant with URIBL listings & may be a waste to have them in static form. > > well, they don't include *just* the URI: > > body __SEEK_MFY7BF /See attach\. http:\/\/www\.[url]\.net\// > > note the "See attach\. " beforehand, which is very unusual. > > also, they aren't static -- they're regenerated daily... asking: will my request be trashed? IMO, nowadays, most "safe" to list URL'd spam runs usually last less than 4 hrs and I'd expect at least 4 URIBL zones to catch them faster than any .cf rule which is why I'd prefer not to included any URI in autogen'd rulesets. If this requires a Amazon type bribe, pls data mail directly :-) Alex ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
