http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5476
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 16:29 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > hey Tom, just getting around to this. :( > > (In reply to comment #3) > > Also, it seems that in our case, the scoring may have to be additive. > > Currently an IP address that meets our COI standards is published in > > both zones, the plus.bondedsender.org zone for COI IP addresses, and the > > query.bondedsender.org zone for all qualifying member IP addresses. The > > query.bondedsender.org zone is the same as the two you query, sa-trusted > > and sa-other.bondedsender.org. > > > > So would it be proper to simply add an additional -3.7 for a positive on > > plus.bondedsender.org to the -4.3 default on a positive > > sa-trusted.bondedsender.org check? > > ok, that works, and makes sense. Great. One down. :) > > > Not sure what you want to do on the sa-other if that IP is a COI IP or not. > > Best to ignore it entirely, and make the COI lookup similar to BSP_TRUSTED; > it only applies to the external-to-internal "firsttrusted" handover. (Any > Received headers after that point are trivially forged, which is why BSP_OTHER > has such a miniscule score; it's purely informational.) This makes sense too. Two down. > > > > I'm not 100% sure about changing the names of the existing rules to > > > RCVD_IN_SSC_* though, since people may have local customisations (score changes > > > etc.) hmm. > > > > Good point. It is actually the same reason we've not changed the zone > > names on our side. I suppose there is no precedent in SA then for > > renaming a rule? > > There is, but it's exceptionally painful, esp for users, so we avoid it if at > all possible. Changing rule description strings, on the other hand, is easy. That all makes sense. I've reviewed the attachement here: http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4095 and this all looks great as is. > More questions: > > - are there test IP addresses in plus.bondedsender.org.? I can't seem > to find any. 127.0.0.2 wasn't in the plus zone so I've added it and you should be able to test. Sorry about that. > > - also, is there tech documentation on that zone (query using TXT/A lookups, > result formats, etc.)? > There is some though it probably needs updating. If you have any input on instructions for SA 3.2 that would be great. Let me know questions either way: http://www.senderscorecertified.org/senderscorecertified/technical.php Let me know how else I can help. When do you think 3.2.4 and 3.3 will be released? Thanks! Tom ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
