Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes: > Justin Mason wrote: > > Daryl -- remind me again -- is this using the GA or the perceptron? it > > probably should use the GA, judging by the number of oddly 0-scored rules. > > The GA. See below regarding scores. > > > Also, any chance you could move it to a subdir of masses, instead of > > in your sandbox? it'd probably be a more appropriate location... > > It's currently extremely hackish and not-too-portable. Once I get it > cleaned up a bit, and documented, I'll move it. I'm planning on having > time to work on it this week.
fingers crossed ;) > >> +score AB_TEST_PDF1 0.581 0.000 0.000 0.000 > > not in active.list for last set1 mass-check so a 0.000 score > >> +score AXB_RCVD_ZOOBSEND 4.099 2.782 0.000 0.000 > >> +score AXB_RCVD_ZOONAT 2.431 2.359 0.000 0.000 > >> +score AXB_XTIDX_CHAIN 0.447 3.778 0.000 0.000 > >> +score BC_ENCODED_PDF 0.491 0.000 0.000 0.000 > > not in active.list for last set1 mass-check so a 0.000 score [etc.] Thanks, they all make sense now! I hadn't understood that. --j.
