http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5682
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-21 10:37 ------- (In reply to comment #0) > we have many DSL customers with statically assigned IP addresses, but generic > DNS names, e.g. static-081-024-000.dsl.nextra.sk. When they are sending mail > to > us, our SA gives them high score because they match FH_HOST_ALMOST_IP, which > often results to marking message as spam. > > Most of them can be avoided by using SMTP authentication, but since they often > run mailserver on that IP (which is why they send mail from it), it's not > always > possible. > > Of course we can change their DNS names, but should FH_HOST_ALMOST_IP really > match this kind of users? It would be nice to combine FH_HOST_ALMOST_IP check > with __RDNS_STATIC the same way RDNS_DYNAMIC does. > > (btw, aren't RDNS_DYNAMIC and FH_HOST_ALMOST_IP kind of redundant?) yes, they are :( I'd prefer to remove FH_HOST_ALMOST_IP if possible -- it's entirely redundant with RDNS_DYNAMIC. there are probably other rules in the rulesrc/sandbox/emailed/00_FVGT_File001.cf file that are similar, I think. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
