http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5704
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-28 04:39 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > let's see how it performs. not bad, but needs a little work: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20071028-r589305-n/T_BUG5704_PUMP_N_DUMP_RATWARE/detail my FPs are: Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk (chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170]) by dogma.boxhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199F93100F2 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 1 Jul 2007 07:54:03 +0100 (IST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chiark.greenend.org.uk) by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.36 #1) with esmtp (return-path [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1I4tJr-0001i9-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 07:54:03 +0100 Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk (chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170]) by dogma.boxhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0DC310090 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 07:54:32 +0100 (IST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chiark.greenend.org.uk) by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.36 #1) with esmtp (return-path [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1Hu11x-0000Zz-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 07:54:37 +0100 looks like Debian Exim uses a different formatting. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
