http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5717
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-15 02:12 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I have no objection to reverting raw rules to per-line regexps BY DEFAULT. > After all, most existing rules were written for that regieme. > > But if the rule is reverted to per-line, can we than have raw:all or raw:full > or raw:morethanaline or some such to retain this capability for those few > rules that would like to specifically run in this mode? Yeah; probably the best bet would be to add a new rule type. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
