http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5711


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-11-18 12:38 -------
: jm 124...; svn commit -m "bug 5711: allow 'mass-check --reuse' without '--net'
to reuse net-rule hits, and output mass-check results for scoreset 1; while
lines that are not reusable use set 0.  Also, fix a few tests to use 'tflags
net' if they use network lookups (including calls to lookup_ptr().)  Fix nightly
mass-checks on the zone to use --reuse to gain this."
Sending        build/nightlymc/corpus.doc
Sending        build/nightlymc/corpus.fredt
Sending        build/nightlymc/corpus.jm
Sending        build/nightlymc/corpus.zmi
Sending        lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URIDNSBL.pm
Sending        masses/mass-check
Sending        rules/20_fake_helo_tests.cf
Sending        rules/20_head_tests.cf
Sending        rules/25_spf.cf
Transmitting file data .........
Committed revision 596095.


so mass-check log lines, if run with --reuse, but not --net, now will be run
with either set 0 or set 1 depending on whether there were net rule hits to
reuse, and will also contain a "set=0" or "set=1" to indicate that for
greppability.

As part of the process, I debugged this on a disconnected machine to track down
net rules that weren't declared as tflags net, and made a few additional tests
into "tflags net" rules:

- SPF_* (several of these were missing 'tflags net')

- FAKE_HELO_* (they all use lookup_ptr() under some circumstances)

- ROUND_THE_WORLD_LOCAL (ditto -- despite the name!)

maybe the latter should be renamed, but I'm not bothered.
Alternatively, maybe some of them should simply be deleted, since
the results are kinda crappy.  I've opened that issue as bug 5726.




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to