http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5594
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-03 08:29 ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Justin -- I don't see anything in the patch that avoids using cached data for > a > rule that has been updated/changed since the cache data was created (which > must > be done). Did I miss something? sorry Daryl -- forgot to reply. :( the cache's key is made up of both the rule's name, and its value -- ie. the rule regexp. so if the rule changes, the cache is invalidated. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
