Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes: > Sidney Markowitz wrote: > > Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote, On 16/12/07 7:42 PM: > >> It appears to be a rule in the process of being removed, but left in > >> place to avoid lint failures. > >> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.2]$ pwd; grep "score DRUG_RA_PRICE" * > >> /home/dos/sasvn/rules/branches/3.2 > >> 50_scores.cf:score DRUG_RA_PRICE 0 # n=1 n=3 > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.2]$ > > > > But I just removed it from branches/3.2/rules/50_scores.cf so that it > > would stop producing a failure in the 3.2 branch make test of t/meta.t. > > Does that automatically migrate over to rules/branches/3.2/50_scores.cf > > and if it does, then will that result in sa-update giving DRUG_RA_PRICE > > a default score of 1 instead of 0? > > No they don't sync. Somebody probably screwed up removing only a part > of it from branches/3.2/rules and didn't do anything with > rules/branches/3.2 (which is really common for some reason... I usually > review all the commits and sync/fix things before I make an update).
Yeah, I suspect that was me. :( Having 2 indepedent rule dirs for 3.2 is too difficult and a bad idea; I suggest when we get to 3.3.x, we ensure there's only 1. --j.
