Justin Mason wrote, On 31/12/07 10:28 AM: > 5736 nor P5 Oth [email protected] FPs on FROM_DOMAIN_NOVOWEL & > URI_NOVOWEL
I agree it can wait unless someone comes up with a proposal for an immediate fix. Any ideas that show up after a 3.2.4 release can probably be handled in update rules anyway. > 5486 maj P5 Oth [email protected] __SARE_OBFU_TBL3 causes core > dump due to recursion and st... I agree that this one can wait too, but what do you think about handling it by just devising a test case to flag installations that need to upgrade their perl version, as I put in a comment there? > 5751 maj P2 Oth [email protected] sa-update leaves rules broken I got a bit confused in the tanglee of comments. What exactly is still in this bug once you separate out issues that are dealt with in bugs 5752 and some elements of bugs 5193, and 5043? As far as I can tell, though, bug 5751 is not something that will be fixed by a reasonable release time of 3.2.4 and should be deferred. > Given this, should I prepare release tarballs once bug 5599 and bug 5748 > have their fixes +1'd? +1 -- sidney
