On Jan 14, 2008 9:06 PM, Sidney Markowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Justin Mason wrote, On 14/1/08 10:29 PM: > > do you find it useful enough? I've been meaning to ask around to see if > > its UI is alright; I'm "too close to the code" to be able to tell > > myself. > > I'm finding it very useful. That one bug that had me fix up the regexp every > time I > clicked on a link was annoying, bit now that's gone. One extra piece of > functionality I > would like would be a way to specify boolean combinations of rules. Then I > could see, for > example, how many spams hit rule A that are not hit by rules B, C, or D and > display the > log entries for those spams. Right now I do that by writing a sandbox meta > rule and > waiting 24 hours.
I presume you're checking out the "overlaps" section of the report? that should be useful... but yes, I can see some kind of meta exploration feature being very handy. any chance you could file an enhancement request? --j.
