http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5666
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 13:01 ------- Here are some things that I came across that could affect some details of these rules. I'm noting them here to make sure that they get documented somewhere. I found a number of emails that hit both __OE_MSGID_2 and __OE_MSGID_4 because sympatico.ca sometimes (but not most of the time) did not remove the original Message-ID when adding a new one. Luckily that doesn't interfere with what these rules are looking for, but I can imagine someone writing rules that assume the existence of only one Message-ID header. Something else I found is that a significant percentage of the __OE_MSGID_3 an __OE_MSGID_4 hits occur without an Outlook or Outlook Express mailer header. That indicates that MTA adds a Message-ID header even when the MUA is not OL/OE. I think that means that the __OE_MSGID_3 and __OE_MSGID_4 tests should be made part of the UNUSABLE_MSGID subrule, not part of an OE-specific rule. They both indicate that an ISP is rewriting the Message-ID and therefore the Message-ID cannot be used as part of a spam-sign. If we do that the names should be changed to something that refers to the ISP and not OE. I'm going to do some more testing with my sandbox to get this right. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
