http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5793
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-13 07:09 ------- ran into this again. http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20080213-r627311-n/URIBL_RHS_DOB/detail#all is a good demo of the issue: SPAM% HAM% 0.00000 22.2189 0.1386 0.994 0.87 0.00 URIBL_RHS_DOB 0.00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.60 0.00 URIBL_RHS_DOB bb-fredt 0.00000 36.7496 0.0550 0.999 0.92 0.00 URIBL_RHS_DOB bb-jm 0.00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.40 0.00 URIBL_RHS_DOB bb-zmi 0.00000 0.0000 0.2801 0.000 0.39 0.00 URIBL_RHS_DOB jm reasons why the SPAM% column has 0 hits: - "bb-fredt": there's no spam in that collection (we should probably have some way to indicate this?) - "bb-zmi": the mails are scanned with network rules enabled, and other net rules are reusable, but URIBL_RHS_DOB is not one of them. this seems to be because it's scanning ancient spam from 2005! (doh. I'll fix this bug) - "jm": the mail scanned in this collection is from the spamtrap, so has no network rule hits marked. I think we need to indicate 3 things here: - the "reuse" data was usable -- the "bb-jm" case. This should maybe just be displayed as it currently is. - there were no spam mails -- "bb-fredt". Maybe grey this out further? - there was no reuse data -- "jm". Some other UI cue that this is the case, another colour maybe? - (perhaps) there was a mix of reusable and nonreusable data. some colour mid-way between the two? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
