https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5817
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-26 04:43 ------- (In reply to comment #34) > If you look at the "STATISTICS*" files in the rules dir of the distribution, > that gives examples of FP rates and how they effect the assigned scores > in terms of GA output. Ah, I see. Really encouraging seeing some rather high scoring rules in the 10-15% spam hit range with a similar FP rate. :) > personally I'd vote for (a) with the private-IP exclusion. That was my preference, too. However, turns out the adjustment for option one and a half indeed is not complicated -- but it isn't exactly trivial either... Based on the previously mentioned rules (see comment 15), here are the instructions for modification. The resulting RE will not fit in here by any means. Basically, this is just exchanging some text in "helo=(!(?!127)| )", the HELO constraint of the rule. Remove "127", exactly that string only, and replace with (?:10|127|169\.254|172\.(?:1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[01])|192\.168)\. without any leading or trailing whitespace. Hope, this isn't too confusing. And Yes, this results in something as ghastly as "(!(?!(?:"... As per M::SA::Constants.pm this equals to all private IPs. Tested locally. Daryl, please add variant D based on this and preferably the single RE variant A. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
