https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5842
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 21:16 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I say yes, they should be tflags net. it's exactly analogous to the DNSBL > rules; they are network lookups, which can record their results in a header > (the > reuse data), which can then be reused in set 0 if --reuse is specified. > IMO that makes sense for the SPF rules (although the recorded results are > put in Received-SPF:). I'm not sure I'd consider them exactly analogous. With a mail system that adds Received-SPF headers before SA sees the message SPF results are used (in all, even non-net, scoresets) without SA *ever* doing the actual network checks. Reuse of the data later in mass-checks, etc, isn't of concern. I'm not aware of --reuse applying to spamassassin or spamd. > what do we need to do to record Received-SPF: btw? Record Received-SPF? We don't. This would be added by a mail system that processes the mail before SA sees it. For example, see the headers of any mail I've sent to an ASF mailling list. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
