https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5822
--- Comment #2 from Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-16 05:59:14 PST --- results from last week's network run: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20080308-r634908-n/URIBL_XBL/detail 0.00000 0.0738 0.0056 0.930 0.70 0.00 URIBL_XBL 0.00000 2.2179 0.0261 0.988 0.85 0.00 URIBL_XBL net-bb-jm 0.00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.40 0.00 URIBL_XBL net-bb-zmi 0.00000 0.0000 0.0296 0.000 0.51 0.00 URIBL_XBL net-cthielen 0.00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.49 0.00 URIBL_XBL net-dos 0.00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.47 0.00 URIBL_XBL net-theo 0.00000 6.2315 0.0162 0.997 0.63 0.00 URIBL_XBL net-zmi so about 93% accurate overall, hitting 0.0738% of spam. I think something must be up there, though -- so ignore the submitters apart from bb-jm and zmi, and you get a more realistic 98-99% accuracy, hitting a low 2.2% / 6.2% of spam. I'll try removing #reuse, to see if that improves figures: : jm 574...; svn commit -m "remove #reuse from URIBL_XBL and see if it improves measurement of its accuracy" rulesrc/sandbox/jm/20_basic.cf Sending rulesrc/sandbox/jm/20_basic.cf Transmitting file data . Committed revision 637582. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
