https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5861
--- Comment #4 from Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-22 05:54:11 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Maybe it should be wise to add DKIM-Signature and DomainKey-Signature to the > > default ignore list? > > +1 > > There's lots of useful header information, but cryptographic signatures aren't > included in that imo. However the presence of the header might be, for some people, or some tokens in those headers. For example, you are *DEFINITELY* losing good data from the Received: headers, I can guarantee that. It's important that we don't make changes to the ignore list without benchmarking its effects using 10-fold cross validation testing. One thing I've found, time and time again, is that Bayes probability combining is a lot smarter than you're giving it credit for -- relatively-weak "ham" or "spam" probabilities will cancel each other out, allowing stronger tokens to have an effect quite nicely. It's not always as simple as they may appear in isolation. (anyway, having said that, if someone wants to do a 10-fold cross-validation run testing ignoring the DK/DKIM sig headers, go ahead.) -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
