https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5871
--- Comment #3 from Ty! Boyack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-04-02 16:47:36 PST --- It would be quite straightforward to do a 'next-host' rather than a 'random-host' shuffle. I'd be glad to change the patch if that is preferred. Doing so with the randomize flag would then mean that the list of servers (A,B,C,D) would be randomly rotated at the start to something like (B,C,D,A), but then we could go through that list sequentially if we have to retry the filter. I'm inclined to agree with Daryl that this would be better - and probably faster to execute at the same time. I'm not familiar with this community - is there a process for determining what the "right" implementation is? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
