https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5887
--- Comment #2 from Sidney Markowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-04-23 14:24:51 PST --- I tested what would happen if I put a \b before and after the existing rule, which would eliminate these two FPs. I would like opinions whether the result is worth puting in. On last nights mass check the test rule eliminates 7 out of the 16 FPs while hitting 158 fewer spams (out of 19708). That gives it a better S/O of 0.991 instead of 0.9845. I added a rule to allow looking at the hits that are eliminated by the rule change. Looking at its details, it appears that most of the FNs for the new rule are high scoring spam anyway. So any opinions as to whether I should change the rule to require word boundaries? SPAM%(of 1165303) HAM%(of 61395) S/O% RANK NAME 1.6776 (19549) 0.0147 (9) 0.991 0.90 T_SIDNEY_FB_CIALIS_LEO3 1.6912 (19708) 0.0261 (16) 0.985 0.89 FB_CIALIS_LEO3 0.0136 (158) 0.0114 (7) 0.545 0.56 T_SIDNEY_FB_CIAL_NONWORD -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
