On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 16:36 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> > Also, I'd like to propose these for sa-update inclusion. Finally, I
> > should add. Any opinion about this?
>
> +1, go for it.
Cool. I'll look into the details and procedure to do so... Thanks.
What about the score? Running both of them locally with 3.0.
> > (Side note: Any ham hits so far
> > turned out to be more likely a dirty corpus, than a real, rare FP. Yay.)
>
> on this issue: it's customary to ask the people to check their corpus; if
> you cut and paste the lines from the "[logs]" link on the per-user
> mass-check results page, and mail those to dev@, the submitters can use
> masses/mboxget to turn those mass-check logs back into the scanned
> message, and tell if it's a real FP or not -- and more importantly, delete
> the misfiled messages from their corpus.
Yes, have been doing this from the very beginning, while the rules still
have been subject to change -- though off list or abusing bugzilla. The
current 2 remaining ham hits have already been verified to be a dirty
corpus, and are being removed.
guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
