https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5926
Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.3.0
--- Comment #4 from Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-24 01:55:14 PST
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Sorry, I misunderstood the RDNS_NONE rule and thought that SpamAssassin would
> do the lookup itself rather than just parsing the Received header. As far as I
> can tell IBM Lotus Domino 7.0.3 will not automatically insert rDNS information
> into a Received header, so perhaps it would be best to add that as a special
> case to the RDNS_NONE rule.
ok. can you provide more samples of Domino 7.0.3 Received: line formats?
> Is there any formal documentation on how rDNS information is supposed to be
> included in a Received header? I think the general requirement is covered by
> RFC 2505, but it doesn't specify a particular format. If Domino isn't doing
> what it's supposed to then I would like to open a formal support incident with
> IBM, but I need to tell them exactly what it should be doing.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/EnvelopeSenderInReceived is the nearest
thing we have to a documented, recommended Received: header format. it matches
what is the nearest thing to a de-facto standard.
thanks!
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
