Sidney Markowitz writes: > peter gervai wrote, On 4/7/08 7:53 PM: > > If there is such one already it's great, and I wonder why it did not > > fire. :-/ > > It looks like Justin put it in his sandbox for testing after after you > suggested it: > > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?rule=REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC > > It didn't catch a huge amount of spam in the corpus, and most of what it > did catch would have been scored as spam by other rules, but it had no > false positives and it did catch a few low scoring spams.
Yeah, not bad at all. thanks! ;) --j.
