https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5947
--- Comment #3 from Karsten Bräckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-27 05:41:45 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > Yes well I happen to want to test for either > X-Bugzilla-A > or > X-Bugzilla-B Your example in the original report comment 0 doesn't do that. > and you provide no other way to do it in one rule! So what? Just because you can do it in a single rule doesn't mean it is faster, or desirable. Use meta. > Yes I could use two "exists" rules, but what if I want to test for all 26 of > them?! Now you're making up examples. Anyway, your request was to mention usage of the complicated ALL pseudo header, at the deliberately simple exists header test. Not a good idea IMHO. They are actually not even related, other than both being header tests. I don't see any point in arguing over this. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
