https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5985
--- Comment #9 from Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-08 03:33:35 PST --- > will that fix Daryl's bug, do you think? I believe it does. The read() is not prone to this perl bug and as a bonus is even faster where we can afford reading in chunks instead of line-by-line (e.g. when the whole file is intended to end up in memory anyway, or when copying it to another file). The remaining cases of line-by-line reads now report EBADF only at a dbg level. I did the missed cases in sa-compile.raw and sa-learn.raw today, revision 702797. The only module still without this playing down of severity is Client.pm. I opened a new perlbug [perl #59550], this time against perl 5.10 and as a general case, not as a missing NL in the last line [perl #39060]. Still waiting for some response. > (asking because I think I may be running into it sporadically -- although I > haven't been able to spot a mass-check where it's occurred for me recently.) Still after my yesterday's check-in? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
