On Monday, November 10, 2008, 10:57:57 AM, Michael Peddemors wrote: > And what would be the overall affects when a server gets blocked? Would this > result in the SA processes backing up, breaking etc..
> Some of the other RBL's that started blocking caused real havoc when SA used > them and the lookup could not connect. > Is there going to be a change in whether the check is on by default? As a practical matter, we're not going to be blocking public DNS queries any time soon. However we will definitely ask large users of public DNS to move to rsync access instead. It's always been the case that rsync access is more appropriate for large-volume mailservers for technical reasons. Cheers, Jeff C. > On Monday 10 November 2008 02:32, Justin Mason wrote: >> Jeff Chan writes: >> > BTW should we post the announcement to the SA Users list? It >> > would affect some of them, though our limit of 250,000 messages >> > per day should be high enough that many/most will keep using the >> > free DNS queries, as before. >> >> Yes, in my opinion it'd be a good idea. >> >> --j.
