On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 13:29 -0800, KentM wrote:
> Forgive me if this has been asked before or has been posted to the wrong
> list, I did a search and did not come back with anything.
The users list would have been appropriate. Regarding the "search
failed" -- a search for a substring of that message does result in good
hits. Maybe you should have tried twice...
> We are an email service provider and we have a feature so that our clients
> can test their messages against Spam Assassin (3.1.9). When one of our
> domain links is in the message we get the following output:
>
> "Contains URL registered to unlisted - WHOIS.com URL is: mcssl.com"
Sounds like WHOIS_UNLISTED. However, did you manually type in this line?
Read, did you alter the string? And indeed:
$ host mcssl.com.bl.open-whois.org
mcssl.com.bl.open-whois.org has address 127.0.0.13
Funnily enough, that rule is *not* in the 3.1 branch... Mind boggling.
> At one time the domain was registered that way, but it was changed
> approximately 2 months ago. If there any reason why the domain would still
> show as being unlisted when the registration has since been changed?
If it actually is the above rule, you want to take this out with
open-whois.org [1]. We don't provide the list, SA merely queries it.
> Any help or additional information you could provide would be greatly
> appreciated.
Any additional information *YOU* could provide would be appreciated.
Like the actual SA rule that's triggered, not just the descriptive
string. HTH
guenther
[1] Note to devs: This seems to hint that open-whois.org data is lagging
or even becoming stale. :( Also, the website appears to be
unresponsive. Their list archives are still alive.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
