On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 23:39 -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > Also... I notice that we're getting zero hits on your list in our > SpamAssassin mass-check data... that seems a little un-good. :( I > realize are ham sample size is small, but zero hits worries me. > > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20081217-r727316-n&rule=%2FIADB&srcpath=&g=Change
Hmm, that's a nightly, not a network mass-check. The latest network run does show some hits, as does the most recent network run before the above nightly, FWIW. http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20090103-r730938-n/%2FIADB Am I overlooking something? :) -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
