https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6048
--- Comment #26 from Anthony Howe <[email protected]> 2009-01-22 12:28:52 PST --- Dallas, (In reply to comment #25) > I've asked Prolexic this in the past and they say they cant do it as the ACLs > apply globablly, and it would be static entries and a named reload anyhow, so > no way for us to manage or automate that flow. I don't understand how they could NOT provide ACLs that work on a source/destination combination. My understanding of most firewalls and packet filters allows for source, destination, or the pair along with additional parameters like port, protocol, sex, etc. to be blended into packet filter rules. Given you choose this data centre host for their abilities to prevent DDoS, which should include sufficient means to block source/destination pairs on demand of the client (or provide a client interface), they should be able to provide service at their gateways. >From what I understand here, the level of uribl.com's service with their provider is insufficient to uribl.com's function. And surely they know what you are doing such that they should be able to help aid you in DDoS issues and high volume disputes through some form of ACL or automated firewall rule creation. To me it sounds like your data centre is not capable or unwilling to provide the level of service required to allow custom(er) rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
