https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6069
Karsten Bräckelmann <guent...@rudersport.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|spamc: learning exit codes |spamc: learning exit codes
|broken |documentation wrong,
| |possible uncaught error
--- Comment #4 from Karsten Bräckelmann <guent...@rudersport.de> 2009-02-18
18:00:55 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> rev 158134, looks like this was changed intentional, almost 4 years ago. Alas,
> the documentation hasn't been adjusted.
>
> Hmm, so successful learning, unavailable (aka previously learned) and even
> *service unavailable* all are expected to return 0, success? Seriously?
More digging. Turns out all of this is bug 1201, revision 158029 (
https://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&rev=158029 ) and some
fixes after that.
According to bug 1201 comment 47, 48 and 49 returning EX_OK indeed is the
desired behavior. Thus, concerning "successful learned" and "already learned"
this is a documentation bug.
Still unsure about the removed EX_UNAVAILABLE from revision 158134 (
https://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&rev=158134 ).
Correcting Summary. And hoping the rev hints get linkified this time.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
