https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6067
Justin Mason <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |6068 --- Comment #1 from Justin Mason <[email protected]> 2009-03-02 10:05:37 PST --- hi Maxim -- just got a chance to look at this. We *did* have a Bat!-message-id-recognition rule, but we found that it got higher false positive rates than other rules that looked for other aspects of Bat! formatting. Unfortunately a small but significant number of mailing lists rewrite the Message ID -- more than rewrite other aspects of the message. You can see the discussion here: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=2294#c8 'Note that FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN and FORGED_THEBAT_HTML catch very nearly the same amount of stuff as FORGED_MUA_THEBAT, without any false positives; also note that we *keep* running into gateways mangling the message-ids, and wierd bug reports like this. So I suggest we just nuke FORGED_MUA_THEBAT in 2.61 (and possibly tweak scores a little to make up, if required -- but I doubt it will be.)' bug 6068 -- using the Date: header formatting -- might be useful as an alternative, however. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
