https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6086
--- Comment #1 from AXB <[email protected]> 2009-03-13 13:43:00 PST --- while the score is a bit on the high side, your FP would have not been if you'd have autotrained Bayes in place and set your "required=" to 5.0 instead of "required=4.0" which may result in many more FPs than just this case. In this case I feel chances of false negatives overweight such a FP case which only applies to one word, in one language, while the cases of obfuscation in spam seem notably higher. -- Note: I'm not a SA developer. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
