https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3109
--- Comment #83 from Matt Kettler <[email protected]> 2009-06-07 17:18:44 PST --- Well, change the rule score, if that's what you want. in local.cf score BAYES_99 3.4 (or whatever score you want). As is, you've shortcircuited on a rule with a score below your spam threshold, so you get exactly what you've asked for. Shortciruciting does not, and really should not, radically alter the score defined for the rule. That's what score statements are for. Why would "shortciricut spam" imply "score 100", when you can just declare whatever score you want? It seems substantially more flexible this way. Also, please be aware that BAYES_99 does have a distinctly non-zero false positive rate. (theoretically 1% of its hits are nonspam, but in practice it's more like 0.1%). You WILL get some nonspam messages tagged by this once in a while. Be sure you're really ready for the implications of what you're doing. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
