https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6142
--- Comment #7 from Tony Meyer <[email protected]> 2009-07-01 04:14:35 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > this isn't the most usable way to deal with the problem, btw. it requires > > keeping up-to-date with the names of the BLs, future changes etc. > > 100% agreed but there's hasn't been a better option. > As SA includes a load of BLs which may or not be wanted and most are enabled > by > default, keeping track has become part of regular management routine. ISTM (disclaimer: I work with the OP), that having a central option to turn off *all* lists is worthwhile, though, for those that just want the other SA features. If you're picking and choosing your lists, then sure you'll have to keep up to date and the score=0 solution is perhaps good enough. Like Justin said, it seems a lot if you just want to turn them all off. For me, the name "skip_rbl_checks" implies "skip all rbl checks", rather than "skip some rbl checks" (yes, this is an assumption). I think it's reasonable to think that other people would think that too, and that it would be reasonable behaviour for the option. However, I'd be just as happy with a set of options that turn off the various checks in bulk, and cross-references in the documentation of the options. The documentation for "skip_rbl_checks" says: skip_rbl_checks ( 0 | 1 ) (default: 0) By default, SpamAssassin will run RBL checks. If your ISP already does this for you, set this to 1. If that also said "you'll need to set the score=0 for the SURBL and URIBL checks as well", that would address 95% of this issue, IMO. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
