On 7/15/2009 11:52 PM, Warren Togami wrote:
On 07/15/2009 05:04 PM, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
We've used the PSBL for quite some time here. Few problems with FP,
however it hits a very, very small amount of traffic (past 24 hours =
0.04%) when used after zen and a couple others. Not sure that adding
it as a default test would be worth the extra traffic generated.
Also, would PBSL be happy with the extra load suddenly added to their
servers? Perhaps this should be something you can add if desired
(exactly as it is now).
-Aaron
My personal mail, zero false positives in RCVD_IN_PSBL in the past 6
months. 157 out of 800 spam triggered RCVD_IN_PSBL since March 2009.
This is after outright MTA rejection of XBL listed hosts, so the PSBL
hit rate might be higher than this.
the PSBL has been a pearl for many years. Would be a pity to see being
hammered to death and vanish like so many others.
Could you ask Rik join the list?
Alex