Warren Togami wrote: > Should we consider all mail in the "Sent" box as legitimate ham to > feed into the masscheck? > > Warren Togami > [email protected] > > It's not going to have a normal set of headers on it, ie: it's unlikely to contain any Received: headers, so I don't think that's good masscheck fodder.
You might be able to use it for bayes training, but even that's a little sketchy.
