https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6156
--- Comment #44 from Warren Togami <[email protected]> 2009-09-03 06:22:59 PST --- (In reply to comment #42) > (In reply to comment #41) > > I guess RCVD_IN_PSBL_2WEEKS is only really useful to more accurately measure > > the FP safety of PSBL in masscheck, since measuring RCVD_IN_PSBL directly is > > inaccurate by design. It shouldn't be enabled as a regular rule. > > well, it should be fine to use in place of RCVD_IN_PSBL, right? "live" mail > will always be < 2 weeks old. Yes fine, but if you think about it is rather useless to test "live" since it will always be true right? I am suggesting it might be useful for masscheck only because we can see both RCVD_IN_PSBL and RCVD_IN_PSBL_2WEEKS to compare. This might be useful to test other network-based rules like pyzor or other DNSBL's as well since they really aren't designed to be accurate for old mail either. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
