huh. wierd. ;) no, no need I guess.... On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 16:18, John Hardin<[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 7 Sep 2009, Justin Mason wrote: > >> crap, it seems more complex than that. can you open a bug to remind >> me to investigate? > > Oh? > > I just looked, it appears to be working. Thanks! > > Still want a bug? > >> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 09:54, Justin Mason<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> oops, forgot I'd turned this off. I'l see if it's easy enough to >>> re-enable, I think it was just a CPU time/work backlog issue >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 04:41, John Hardin<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Can anybody say when the rule overlap analysis will be restored to the >>>> masscheck ruleqa web pages? That's a valuable tool for rule development. > > -- > John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ > [email protected] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [email protected] > key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Where We Want You To Go Today 07/05/07: Microsoft patents in-OS > adware architecture incorporating spyware, profiling, competitor > suppression and delivery confirmation (U.S. Patent #20070157227) > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > 10 days until the 222nd anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution > >
-- --j.
