https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6156
--- Comment #57 from Warren Togami <[email protected]> 2009-09-08 06:38:34 PST --- (In reply to comment #56) > Well I just checked and for me deep parsing does work MUCH better. It catches > lots of relayed/forwarded/list etc mail, which lastexternal obviously doesn't. > The very small amount of FPs doesn't bother me and I can trusted_networks such > anyway. Yeah, I suspected this. I have ZERO FP's before the rule change, and I lose 20%+ of the spam hits afterward. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
