On 09/28/2009 04:32 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
I agree we should have used lastexternal. we can do the 'subtract' trick but I'd prefer to do it by simply splitting the rules into a RCVD_IN_PSBL_LASTEXTERNAL (score 2) and RCVD_IN_PSBL_DEEP (score 1), possibly using metas, so that users don't see a confusingly negative score hitting on spam -- principle of least surprise and all that.
Could the lastexternal version be called simply RCVD_IN_PSBL? That seems to be expected of DNSBL's and shorter name is better I guess.
Warren
