https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6155
--- Comment #73 from Mark Martinec <[email protected]> 2009-10-06 15:57:29 PDT --- > Please check if these are really ham messages and four more from the second run: ../../aaa_ham/2009-07_HAM_704334.0 ../../aaa_ham/2009-08_HAM_810051.0 /local/cor/recent/ham/priv.20050914/137533 /home/dos/SA-corpus/ham/dos/Inbox-2008/ 1221834769.M749008P21562V0000000000000302I00414902_237.cyan.dostech.net,S=26243:2,S Also, I find scores on URIBL_(AB|JP|WS)_SURBL to be rather low compared to my experience (e.g. one FP out of 39.000 on URIBL_WS_SURBL at my ham-bayes-net-mmartinec.log), so my guess is that several of the following hits could be false positives on these rules: grep -c 'URIBL_WS_SURBL' ham-bayes-net-jm.log 178 grep -c 'URIBL_AB_SURBL' ham-bayes-net-jm.log 42 grep -c 'URIBL_JP_SURBL' ham-bayes-net-jm.log 29 grep -c 'URIBL_JP_SURBL' ham-bayes-net-bluestreak.log 28 egrep -c 'URIBL_(AB|JP|WS)_SURBL' ham-bayes-net-hege.log 7 grep -c 'URIBL_WS_SURBL' ham-bayes-net-dos.log 4 -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
