https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6155
--- Comment #95 from Warren Togami <[email protected]> 2009-10-11 07:03:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #94) > The DNSWL stats posted by Warren to the users list seem to indicate that this > should be the correct ordering (at least based on safety): > > | SPAM% HAM% RANK RULE > | 0.0016% 4.2489% 0.91 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI > | 0.0281% 6.9639% 0.90 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED > | 0.1147% 3.9169% 0.81 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW These were yesterday's weekly results, not the rescore masscheck. Weekly results are a smaller sample size and lower confidence. http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20090930-r808953-n SPAM% HAM% RANK RULE 0.0002% 0.3651% 0.75 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI 0.0288% 18.6970% 0.79 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED 0.0753% 8.1433% 0.68 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW This was the rescore masscheck. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
