https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6247
--- Comment #16 from AXB <[email protected]> 2009-12-04 15:43:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > > CERTIFIED = 0.0001 (informational) > > SAFE = -2.5 > > Please don't. The criteria for being on the Certified list is more difficult > for senders to achieve than the Safe list (though of course both are more > difficult than not reaching any whitelisting criteria at all.) > > If you're only going to give one of our lists any benefit, it should be > Certified. Not sure why you'd do that, though, when other whitelists with > much > less stringent criteria already receive higher scores in the default > configuration. sorry my mixup. CERTIFIED = -2.5 SAFE = 0.0001 as to other lists.. I'd *assume* they either have very low coverage or their performance hasn't been debated as much as yours. For several reasons, my personal choice is to always comment out all the certifying services but I can't expect everyone to agreee. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
