https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6247
--- Comment #32 from Justin Mason <[email protected]> 2009-12-08 09:17:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #30) > > > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091205-r887515-n/RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED/detail > > > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091205-r887515-n/RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW/detail > > > I also think we should reduce the DNSWL scores. It seems that policing at > > > DNSWL might be lax as they don't offer any easy and obvious way to report > > > violations. (No, I will not report violations of whitelists, or blacklist > > > FP's, because doing so would artificially effect the measurements that we > > > do.) > > > > RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI -5 > > RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2 > > RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.5 > > > > Based upon current performance I believe these scores would be appropriate. > > I > > think we should adjust these and returnpath's scores on-the-fly with > > sa-update > > as we have more carefully examined their performance over time. > > > > Any objections? > > objection to hijacking a bug for something else? yes > pls open a separate bug for DNSWL adjustments/issues. > this is about HABEAS and BSP yep, please open a new bug for the DNSWL discussion (link to this one, of course). (other than that, +1) -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
